• Punctual Ground Connection
(PGC): A ground connection installation
consisting of simple or mixed electrodes, usually
concentrated symmetrics and reduced coverage area in the
soil. The purpose of a PGC is to supply the zero
referential potential additionally to protecting persons.
• GCR Measurement Current:
It determines the measurement range and efficiency
of the soil’s electric parameters. Portable
measurement instruments inject up to dozens of miliamperes
(short range); and autonomous measurement systems, dozens
of amperes (long range).
• GCR Measurement Potential:
It appears in the soil when the measurement current
flows. Its magnitude is the difference between the
potential obtained by the GC and the zero potential of the
Remote Earth, located in an intermediate point of the soil
surface accomplishing said electric condition.
•
Ground Connection Resistance (GCR): It corresponds to
the resistance opposed by a GCE and the surrounding soil
to the passage of a measurement current that is collected
in another point of the soil sufficiently far away and in
the presence of a net d.d.p. with respect to the Remote
Earth represented by an intermediate point.
•
Maximum Dispersion Potential (MDP): It is the maximum
voltage a GC may obtain with respect to the zero
referential potential of the Remote Earth each time it
disperses a fault current disperses into the soil of the
system’s Earth. Its magnitude is limited strictly
to 5 Kw.
•
Earth-return Circuit: It allows system or fault
currents return to the own source. It is formed by
the GCE or the Earth Fault point, then the soil and
subsoil or other conductor mean, and finally the GC from
the source or the Parasite Capacitances Phases
(sound)-Earth.
•
Final User Grounding: It is the only connection for
the low tension of a user. It consists of an
exclusive conductor, which departing from the output
terminal of the Distribution Board, descends with the
minimum run towards the GC to which it connects soundly.
•
Inner System of the Grounding: It develops upstream of
the steady loads or the socket from the final user’s
installation. It consists of the Earth Conductors
(protection) converging on the Distribution Board’s
equipotential bar together with the Phase Conductors.
• Down-to-Earth Circuit
Charge: It consists of the Parasite Capacitances from
the entire down-to-earth connection system shown when a
GCR is measured capturing the electric charge supplied by
the instrument’s source producing a lower d.d.p. which
leads to low erroneous values.
Fig 5.-
Classic Arrangement of GCR Measurements
The
measurement consists of making flow a Current (I)
generated by a source between the GCE (a) and the farthest
electrode with which the Current circuit (a, c) closes,
recording the Tension drop (V) between the GC and the
nearest electrode, which corresponds to the Potential
circuit (a, b) so said Potential circuit would be placed
in the point identified by its zero Potential.
Determination
of the Electrode’s GCR (Raa)
The method is
based on the measurement of the Resistance existing
between every two electrodes driven into the ground in the
points (a, b, c), each with a proper DR (Raa, Rbb and
Rcc), considering that keeping the current (I) with the
same value, mutual Resistances are produced in both
electrodes (Fig 6). For example, (Rab and Rba)
result from measuring the Resistance between electrodes
(a, b).

Fig 6.-
Scheme of the Principle – Total Resistance Measurement
between two points in the Soil

Following the
same procedure between points (a-c) and (b-c) of (Fig 5),
adding and then subtracting, it gives the following
result:

As electrode
8b) is connected to a high-Impedance voltmeter, it may be
concluded there would not flow any current through said
measurement point. Therefore, replacing

resulting in

According to
the above, the DR (Raa) will be obtained when the result
of the equation in parenthesis is zero.
Determination
of Measurement Circuit Distances
Considering
an homogeneous soil with unique Resistivity (r), the
condition established to determine (Raa) is analyzed
considering that the potentials between every two points
vary inversely proportional to their distances.
Then, if
Raa
+ Rac - Rbc = 0 may be interpreted
as

Resulting in
a second-degree equation, which positive root solution
allows establishing the general relationship of the
measurement distances of current circuits (d) and
Potential (p)
p = 0,618 x d
p.u.
Therefore,
the Potential electrode (b) should have to be placed
exactly at distance (p) to represent the zero value of the
Remote Earth (Fig 7) given that in other point even inside
of the same trajectory would represent a potential other
than zero that would be subtracted or added to the
measurement.

Fig 7.-
Measurement Currents and Potentials for the Classic Method
of Potential Drop
Subtracted
Potential: It occurs when the electrode (b) is placed
nearer to GC (a) resulting in measurements (optimistic) of
lesser Resistance than the actual resistance.
Aggregate
Potential: It occurs when the electrode (b) is placed
nearer to Current electrode (c), resulting in measurements
(pessimistic) of greater Resistance than the actual
resistance.
Application
of the Classic Method of Potential Drop - Approximate
The
measurement method described for homogeneous soil imposes
a display of measurement distances (d, p) proper for each
GC which depends on its coverage. In every case, the
results will also depend on the correct relation of said
distances and the location and good contact with the soil
of the measurement electrodes placed at the end of the
straight trajectories starting from the GC, whether it
would be on the same direction or divergent making an
angle lower than 90º.
Application
of the Classic Method of Potential Drop - Accurate
The principle
and basic implementation conditions of Measurements are
identical to the approximate procedure. The
difference is established when considering the case where
the soil bedding –which is actually for electric
use—corresponds in most cases to a two-stratum scheme.
This means that the relation of distances (p and d) will
be different every time depending on the Resistivities of
said strata, and therefore, each accurate measurement
shall need a new relation of distances (p/d) for the exact
location of point (b) of zero Potential. There are
two procedure somewhat laborious.
a.-
Point-by-Point Measurements (Fig 8)
In cases with
soils with thick superficial strata and especially with
much contrast of Resistivities, or when establishing
analytically and exactly the DR’s value of a GC,
considering the soil’s conformation, it is decided to
first determine a characteristic of points with apparent
value measured on the soil.

Fig 8.-
Characteristics of Apparent GCR Measurement Points
Distance (d)
is divided into 10 equal segments for the progression of
the set of measurements of (r) with the corresponding
distance (p), the points obtained are (R against p),
drawing the curve with a mathematic regression and
determining the Conic or Nonstop Function f(p).
DR’s exact
value (RT) is determined in the projection of the Conic
Inflection Point in the Axis of Ordinates after having
been located with the abscissa value resulting when
f’’(p) = 0, or when f’’(p) is not defined.
The difference with the approximate Measurement may be
seen projecting also the abscissa (p=0.618 d) in the Axis
of Ordinates; usually there is a minimum difference.
b.-
One-Point Measurement
Considering
that the soil Resistivities in the two-strata model have
influence in the injected current (I) based on its
Reflection Coefficient (K), the soil parameters in the
two-strata model (r1, r2, h1) should be included.
Based on the
conditions (d > 20 r0 y h1 > 5 r0), the equation of
the Classic Measurement Method Potentials is solved
considering the relations of the measurement distance (d)
with the distance of the Potential electrode (p/d) and the
thickness of the superficial stratum (h1/d) having the
reflection coefficient (k) as a family-curve parameter.
For the
accurate measurement, having determined 8d) from (r0),
distance (p) should be determined reaching abscissas with
the relation (h1/d) intercepting the curve with reflection
factor (k) from where it projects to the ordinates in
order to obtain the relation (p/d) with which the unique
measurement is executed.
4.
CONDITIONS FOR MEAUREMENT ACCURACY
The random
form of the bedded soil composition as well as the
characteristics and coverage of the GC installations to be
measured under the same procedure indicate that the range
of Resistances may be wide and as such could be inclined
to errors or distortions prompted by several sources
participating in the measurement process.
The
Measurement Current
The need to
use the supply source of a portable instrument or a power
unit is related to the coverage of the GCE. The
classic comparator instruments (tellurometers, geometers)
that usually have minimal ranges, are used to measure
PGCs, free of any down-to-earth connection, while the
autonomous power sources ranging KW are used for extended
groundings.
The
measurement current must flow exclusively through the
circuit including GCE (a) with the auxiliary current
electrode (c), i.e. the GC must be totally free of any
other connection representing an unsustainable consumption
of energy due to the capacity of the source, As in the
case of the “down-to-earth” connection (Fig 9) from
the mass clamps or the panel’s equipotential bar, which
circuits include parasite Capacitances to Earth creating
additional tension drops recorded by the instrument in
giving lower values to that of the currently existing
Resistance.

Fig 9.-
Scheme of a GCR Measurement including the down-to-earth
circuit for connection
On the other
side, considering the passage of erratic currents from the
system through the soil at a commercial frequency, it is
not advisable to use the same low service frequency for
the measurements. It would be better to use a higher
or lower non-harmonic frequency from FI, or instead, a
direct current with a switching device during the
measurement process in order to prevent soil polarization.
Measurement
Circuits
The accuracy
of measurements depends on the distance (d) established
for the Current circuit in relation to the GC coverage
represented by its Equivalent Electric Radius (r0),
according to which if the range of the portable
instrument’s wiring according to Catalogue is lower than
said required distance (d) then the measurements will
increase even more the error giving always lesser
Resistances than the actual ones.
For an
Equivalent Electric Radius GC (r0) in Fig 10, each curve
of points (r against p) correspond to a distance also
fixed (d). It is then noted that the results carry
less errors each time greater distances (d) are taken.

Fig 10.-
Measurement Characteristics based on the Distance Error
Parameter (d)
After
establishing the corresponding margins of error, the
correlation of both fixed parameters (d/r0) allow
identifying the ratio for the range considered admissible,
which as a logarithmic variation magnitude where several
random factors participate during the field measures may
be:
Error = 3.3
%, when

Therefore,
Standard IEEE-81 recommends for (d) a minimum of 50 m (d
« 125 r0), and the IEC Rule a minimum of 40 m (d « 100
r0) to guarantee a greater accuracy. However, it is
difficult to comply with the conventional portable
instruments with lower range.
In practice,
when measuring in PGCs, the acceptable error could be of
up to (5%), which takes to establish a minimum measurement
distance applicable on the soil with portable instruments.
The potential
difference between the GCE and the Remote Earth (V=0)
representative point must be established correctly from
the measurement circuit, i.e., the GC coverage should not
have influence on the measurement electrode used as
potential probe (the current lines should not be closed
through said electrode).
5.
CONCLUSIONS
a. The
application of the Principle of Potential Drop to the GCR
measurement of punctual electrodes installed have been
basically analyzed considering the representative location
of the Remote Earth within the measurement scheme.
b. The
most common measurement methods for GCRs have been
described emphasizing the interpretation guidelines and
application of the Classic Method of Potential Drop due to
the greater approximation or accuracy that may be obtained
based on either parameter electrical and/or physical
applied in the measurement.
c. We
have shown that for GCR reliable measurements in any type
of bedded soil, the modality of the Classic Method of
Potential Drop – Approximate, is the most advisable due
to its simplicity, good resolution and minimal error.
Engineer
Justo YANQUE M.
Lima, 2002.